Gorham vs. Berlin vs. Randolph

I skipped the Berlin city council this evening to attend a public hearing in Gorham about expanding ATV trail usage to include some of the rails to trails land in Gorham, creating a corridor to Success. The conversation got heated at times as Randolph residents and several Gorham residents voiced their opposition to ATVs sharing the multi-use trails.
I couldn’t help but laugh watching the two camps, with divisions that go far beyond their preferred method of motorized or non-motorized recreation. It was a civics lesson but also an economics lesson. It was also a discussion Berlin should be watching.
Advocates for the plan want Jericho to connect to Success via Gorham, because they see potential for economic benefit in Gorham. They are betting a direct trail from Gorham will keep the ATVers sleeping and eating in Gorham, even if the Berlin allows ATVs on city streets.
If the infrastructure is already in Gorham and that trail opens, what will be the incentive to open a hotel or restaurant in Berlin? What will be the incentive to stay or eat in Berlin? Maybe there will be so many ATVers that the region will have to build excess capacity, but if not Gorham certainly has less to do to make itself the next ATV destination: it merely has to open a trail. Berlin has to build a tourist infrastructure, and that could take years instead of days.
But then there are the Randolph residents. I didn’t see one under 40, and they were not ATV riders. They talked about hiking and biking and snowshoeing and skiing, about how wonderful it is to hear the snow melt off trees on a winter’s day, and about how much they detest ATVs and snowmobiles noise. They were worried the trail might one day continue west from Gorham along the rail to trail property on U.S. Route 2, and they have been circulating emails for more than a week discussing how they can protect against such development. They have contacted representatives and senators and the executive council, and they have been amassing supporting organizations to their corner.
They were a different people talking a different language.
It goes back to the conversation I was having before, about seeing the other person’s perspective. The ATVers in the room didn’t have any appreciation for the fact that ATVs are annoying to people who don’t ride ATVs, and the non-ATVers didn’t have any appreciation for the fact that ATVers have a right to ride. Everyone just complained about the other side, while I tried not to laugh. (I feel comfortable laughing in Berlin council meetings—I know everyone there pretty well now—but this was Gorham, where I don’t know anyone.)

Berlin has something unique on this front: a lack of naysayers. In the months I’ve been covering the ATV issue I’ve heard one person speak out against it. In Gorham tonight there were 25 people that spoke against it, and 50 people came to the meeting. The room only had seats for 40, so people were standing against the walls and crammed in the doorway. It is a different issue in Gorham than it is in Berlin—the contingent of hikers and cyclists is larger there, and their perspective might make this a fight. One woman put it well, saying ATVing and other sports don’t go together well. They don’t have to be separated, she said, but it helps. In Berlin, it isn’t much work to separate the two, because there aren’t people doing other things. In Gorham, it’s much more an issue, and something that will likely inspire more debate. Randolph is like Berlin, but only the other side of the issue, so again there isn’t really a fight.

Berlin and Gorham may soon be competing for the ATV dollars, and Gorham has a head start. The ATV park may be in Berlin, but there aren’t lots of places there to spend your money if you come up for the weekend, and that will take time to change. In the meantime Gorham might take the thunder out of Berlin’s efforts to become the ATV capital of the state, simply by opening a trail.

One final thought: some people (including Chris Gamache from the Bureau of Trails) spoke of regionalization. I’ve heard that term a lot lately, from talking about schools to local government to economic development. But then, back at each town hall and city council chambers, I hear councilors and selectmen talking about how they want the businesses in their town to benefit, that they don’t care about the community down the road. The Grand Hotels, Grand Adventures initiative argues the region doesn’t have a critical mass to draw people in any one town, but as a region they do. But the region isn’t a region; it’s like Afghanistan or Africa—carved out of a map by people disconnected from its past, its future, its economy and its people. Gorham doesn’t like to be associated with Berlin, and Berlin resents Gorham’s success. No one there talks to Lancaster or Errol, and Colebrook is off by itself. Grand Hotels, Grand Adventures is an effort to make this appear a cohesive unit outside Coös County, but there is no effort to make it a cohesive unit within Coös County. It would be a shame if Gorham scoops the ATVers away from Berlin, if for no other reason than it will heighten the animosity between the two. The two communities will continue fighting each other, instead of cooperating to make each other stronger.
Mayor David Bertrand said in an interview today the current council thinks outside the box, something past Berlin city councils haven’t done. But when it comes to regionalism, this council is in step with past councils. Provincialism runs deep, and it seems to be a box the region can’t find its way out of. In a city and a region searching for useful answers to complex questions, it’s a shame to see so much animosity directed at people stuck in the same boat.

5 thoughts on “Gorham vs. Berlin vs. Randolph

  1. Great post, Erik. The towns and cities that thrive most get over rivalry and become regionalized where it makes sense and protect individuality where it provides a niche. Berlin, I think, needs to count on Gorham for its hospitality in growing the ATV business due to Gorham's already existing infrastructure you speak of and also its more favorable reputation/perception. Berlin, as the host town, needs to be appreciated by Gorham. Randolph, Milan and Shelburne have the ability to offer non motorized recreation nearby. So does Berlin, so does Gorham. We can recognize what the majority of people in given towns and cities want and act on that and offer synergy to one another. My guess is that an ATV family may have a family member that might prefer cross country skiing or hiking in Randolph one weekend, or staying by the poolside at one of the Gorham hotels one day. We should all be glad the synergies exist already and are only a few miles apart. These towns as well as Berlin can continue to have the importance of individuality and synergize at the same time. We just need to look outside of the box we sometimes put ourselves in and recognize we can all do better with one another. Jon

  2. It is well known that Bill Jackson hates Berlin. It would be nice to think that attitude will change in the Gorham town hall with a new town manager, but I doubt it. The North Country suffers from a big continent of close minded individuals who cannot see past their front door. This will only get worse if Paul Grenier is elected Mayor. He’s about as arrogant and close minded as they come. Nice post Eric, you hit the nail right on the head.

  3. Grenier says he won't take money from out of town, but maybe he'll be willing to take free shares of LLEG stock. He probably already has a 51% ownership in the dirty little company.

  4. Oh good, an anonymous comment without any basis in fact or attribution.I worked hard to report the story about private Laidlaw investors supporting Mr. Grenier's campaign. Now, whether he likes it or not, he will be subject to criticism because of the actions of a few out-of-town investors. He said he has not received money and that he will return any donations sent to him from outside the city. If you want to call Mr. Grenier a liar, do it to his face, not on LPJ. My goal is not to support or hurt any campaign; I want to get all the facts before the public so voters can make an informed decision. I asked Mr. Bertrand the same questions and contacted people who tried to give him money. If my story keeps out of town money from influencing the Berlin election then good, but if you wish to sling rumors about people who's views you disagree with, go to another forum.Thank you.And to Jon and other people leaving thoughtful comments, thanks for writing.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s